To be perfectly honest, I‘m surprised more people aren’t putting their “critical thinking” skills to use. I think the global warming scare is getting pretty old, but it’s going to continue to ride as long as people refuse to question the status quo and think for themselves. Through out all of history, the earth’s climate has fluctuated. We don’t fully understand the climate, and in fact, the only constant thing about the climate is change. Media is very good at spreading the word of global warming. Why? Because it sells. They’re not really concerned with if it’s true or not, but heck, it sure will bring in some attention. Scientists can pump out as many charts as they want, but they really do seem agenda driven. One example is the sea level chart in this particular reading. It begins charting levels from approximately 1875 to today with the chart consistently going up. Big industry didn’t even start in the 1800’s. In fact, the industrial age didn’t really get cooking until after WW2. Who’s the blame for the constant rise in the 1800’s, which was already consistently going up. Here’s another one. The chart shown in class the other day showed the average temperatures of the earth throughout history. The fluctuations were incredible. Who was to blame for the crazy climate back then? Those darn cave men. Those cave fires must warmed the earth to get them out of the ice age. What about the medieval warm? (Don’t worry, I went on skepticalscience.com for this one) The argument against warming back then versus now was simply a circular argument. The last sentence even said. “These causes of warming contrast significantly with today’s warming, which we know now cannot be caused by the same mechanisms.” Oh, so we just KNOW, for sure. None of the natural earthly phenomena that occurred then are happening now. It’s all us lazy Americans going CO2 crazy! I’m not convinced. Which brings me to CO2. C02 is not even a major greenhouse gas, yet is deemed as the fall of mankind as we know it. In many cases, temperature rises before CO2 does. That’s as backwards saying that “lung cancer causes smoking” (Dr. Bob. Carter) Not only that, but a 2006 UN report claimed that livestock and the industry revolving around it are responsible for 18% of all greenhouse gases. When measured in a CO2 equivalent, it would be more than the worldwide transportation sector. Methane is the main gas in this, and it takes 1/12 the time to cycle out of the atmosphere than CO2. (Glenn Beck, An Inconvenient Book) Natural emissions warm the earth 23 times more than the oh-so-feared CO2. I could write all day about this, but I’ll stop here with just these few. My point is, I’m not denying that the world is get globally warmer. It’s a natural cycle. What I am denying is the exaggeration of man's impact on the environment. Global warming is all speculation. There is no basis. If anything, the only meat it has behind it is a manipulative political agenda.
“Without God, there is not virtue, because there’s no prompting of the conscience. Without God, we’re mired in the matter, that flat world that tells us only what the senses perceive. Without God, there is coarsening of the society. And without God, democracy will not and cannot long endure. If we ever forget that we’re one nation under God, then we will be a nation gone under.” - Ronald Reagan
Thursday, September 22, 2011
Liberal Brainwashing..In Community College?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

Hannah;
ReplyDeleteHave you ever argued the point that science or "natural law" is from God, no more or no less than the supernatural?
Why is it when an earthquake happens we can easily justify it as the earths plates rubbing up against each other but when someone with cancer wakes up one morning and the cancer is gone we scratch our heads in wonder?
The naturalist..AKA Enlightened humanist atheist will say that it was a freak genetic anomoly. But I ask again, is that not a miracle by another name?
Take this statistic for example;
The total man made pollutant today is less than 1/1000 of 1 percent of the atomic destruction that the earth experienced some 5 billion years ago during it's formation of being pummled with meteorites and astroids from the heavens.. Yet life did come about in spite of this.
As a proponent of intelligent design versus creation, I find the hand of God no less present in this process than if he simply "poofed" the world into existence.
When you find yourself arguing the whole global warming issue with those "smart" people, simply bring that point up.. How did we ever get here through the utter destruction of Earth 4.5 billion years prior to the first record of an upright vertabrete humanoid?
You will be amazed at how far ones jaw can drop.